Causes Of The Dispute And Major Events
The European Commission said that in 2023, the EU imported 223 billion yen worth of goods from China, but exported almost twice that amount to Beijing, at 471 billion euros. Trade imbalances were not common in the past, and these unfair trade allegations are undoubtedly one of the factors leading to calls for more protectionist policies. The EU began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese steel products in early 2024 on the grounds that these products were too low – to the detriment of European manufacturers.
Technology transfer, intellectual property rights
At the heart of the trade dispute are TT and intellectual property rights Europeans, however, have accused China of forcing European companies to share technology in exchange for market access? “, which states that European companies, as before, are subject to political pressure from the Chinese authorities, who do not treat them equally at all – only offering access with investment or technology transfer agreements”. This was the case with a high-profile case brought by the European division of a car manufacturer, which claimed that it was forced to include electric vehicle technology in its Chinese joint venture.
Public institutions and support
The EU has long complained about Chinese subsidies to state-owned enterprises (SOEs). According to the European Commission, this tilts the competition. As early as 2023, the EU published a report stating that China’s solar panel subsidies led to overproduction and lowered international prices, thus harming local solar panel producers. He said that the EU responded by raising import tariffs on Chinese solar panels to prevent its own industry from being destroyed.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Law
Differences in environmental and labor standards are another area of conflict. EU officials have slammed China for not being strict enough in environmental and other standards, resulting in lower production costs for Chinese goods. In October, a majority of MEPs called for the rapid introduction of the CBAM and for it to be operational no later than 2023, as they considered China an export competitor. The import ban on some Chinese products has attracted attention from human rights activists and also from China’s violations of labor rights in trade, especially in the Xinjiang region.
Retaliation and major events
Trade tensions have continued to rise, and two major events in June have made the situation worse. In September 2023, the EU announced that it would investigate China’s electric vehicle subsidies, suspecting that it disrupted the market order. In response, China has warned to stop exporting important materials – such as rare earth elements, which are vital to many European industries. The agreement also targets issues that the United States is dissatisfied with in Sino-EU trade relations, and it is a turning point for Beijing and Brussels, which have taken a more confrontational approach to human rights and business practices.
Continue national chambers of commerce and diplomatic efforts
But the two sides are still negotiating to resolve their differences. If the EU holds some high-level dialogue, it will require China to make more commitments in exchange for favorable trade practices, environmental standards and intellectual property protection. They showed typical distrust of each other in 2024 and facilitated another round of bilateral talks at the beginning of this year, focusing on reducing the trade deficit between the two sides “and alleviating European concerns about the alleged relaxation of subsidies and forced technology transfer.”
Positions And Responses Of Both Sides
For its part, the EU has never forgotten to emphasize that a level playing field—especially with regard to subsidies and state-owned enterprises (SOEs)—is also crucial before Brexit. The European Commission has a detailed report on how Chinese subsidies promote unfair competition, which is reflected in industries such as steel and solar panels (European Commission 2020).
Some Chinese companies are also reportedly urging certain European companies to share their technological achievements, which will only allow them to enter the lucrative Chinese market. The EU has repeatedly called out forced technology transfer in its 2023 Trade Barriers Report, characterizing it as an unfair practice and identifying more than 50 cases affecting companies headquartered in Europe.
China’s stance
Beijing has denounced the current US trade practices as “restrictive,” but claims that its own economic policies should be in line with international standards. China’s Ministry of Commerce said in a statement late last year that China subsidizes industries in accordance with its strategy. China said its agricultural subsidy policy is no different from that of many developed countries, and cited the United States and the European Union as examples.
On technology transfer and intellectual property rights, China acknowledged that there is still room for improvement in these areas, while criticizing the EU and accusing it of protectionism. China officially announced in a trade white paper around 2023 that it will continue to urge stronger protection of intellectual property rights, including the establishment of intellectual property courts and increased penalties for violations.
Diplomatic response
In November 2023, the EU and China established an economic and trade dialogue on issues of common concern. The dialogue included topics such as market issues, subsidy conditions and regulatory opening. A delegation led by EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis sent a letter to China, calling on China to “renew its commitment” and not favor domestic companies. In December 2023, Chinese Vice Premier Liu He spoke about the trade bloc between the two countries when meeting with European leaders.
Economic countermeasures
On January 3 and 4, the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on Chinese steel and CBAM. Overreacting to the bottle issue. At that time, China retaliated with trade threats against unfair practices in the field of European automotive coatings and wine imports. That is, the economy suffered huge losses. European BlueTorrent sales fell 15% in the first quarter of 2024 compared with the same period last year.
Public and industry response
Manufacturing lobby groups in the 28-nation EU have long complained that these industries have been hit by low-priced Chinese imports. The European Federation of Wine and Wine Industries also called for the continuation of anti-dumping duties and the strengthening of enforcement of trade rulings. China’s response was mixed. Many industries support the government’s goals, but others worry about what a longer trade dispute might mean for them. In September, a report from China’s tech industry called on government officials to strengthen intellectual property protections as they look to boost innovation and compete globally.
Economic Impact Analysis
The Sino-EU trade dispute has led to a fall in EU profits, with EU manufacturers having higher costs than Chinese manufacturers, and tariffs could also increase costs for European producers who rely on these imports. According to a 2023 report by the European Steel Association (EUROFER) reflecting the impact of these tariffs, they have raised production costs for steelmakers across Europe by about 10%.
Starting in 2023, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will link import tariffs to the carbon content of goods entering the single market. It is designed to help encourage companies to be good environmental stewards, but it also increases costs for companies importing Chinese-made goods. In Europe, the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) said that rising prices for Chinese parts have led to an average 7% increase in its car production costs. Chinese tariffs are hitting Europe across the board: Bloomberg reported, based on data from the European Commission, that European car exports to China fell 15% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2014, and there are signs that the Champagne industry and private label wines have also been hit.
Impact on China
The dispute has also taken an economic toll on China. EU and CBAM anti-dumping duties have significantly reduced the competitiveness of Chinese products in the EU market. Chinese exports to the EU fell by 8% in 2032. On the downside, this has led to job losses and reduced revenues in the industry, with the China Iron and Steel Association reporting a 5% year-on-year decline in steel exports in 2023. The solar panel industry fared slightly better, with the China Photovoltaic Industry Association recording a 6% drop in exports to the EU.
Wider economic impact
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in its January 2024 report, trade tensions could reduce global economic growth by 0.2 percentage points next year. The world’s two largest economies are also the largest trading partners, and their tit-for-tat battle has caused uncertainty in global markets.
Industries in the supply chain are particularly facing disruptions on both sides of the region. The European electronics industry says tariffs on Chinese components have led to backlogs and price increases. Chinese companies, for example, have also faced disruptions in getting inputs from Europe, leading to higher prices for goods or increased production difficulties.
Impact on specific industries
Trade debate: The trade dispute has had the most significant impact on several industries. The European automotive industry has been hit hard by tariffs on Chinese parts and counter-tariffs on European cars. Ashford Castle, CongACEA said these trade barriers led to a 10% drop in production for European automakers in the first half of this year.
The technology industry has also been severely affected. It was revealed that well-known European technology companies that rely on Chinese manufacturing have experienced cost surges and major launch delays. In March 2024, a top European smartphone company decided to postpone the debut of its new model due to supply chain disruptions caused by the trade dispute.
Financial market reaction
The ongoing trade tensions have also brought heightened volatility to financial markets. The Euro Stoxx 50 index, one of the major European market indices, fell more than 5% in early February as investors sold most of their stocks on reports of an impending trade war and a global economic slowdown. Content out of control In China, the Shanghai Composite Index also closed mixed, down 4% over the same period. Investor confidence has declined as both European and Chinese markets have seen capital flight. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank said capital outflows from the European Union rose 3% last year as trade tensions led investors to move money into safer assets. The People’s Bank of China also said earlier that capital outflow pressure from China had intensified, with outflows rising 2%.
Political And Diplomatic Factors
The EU has taken a broader political approach to resolving its trade dispute with China. Two years later, in 2023, the European Commission stepped up scrutiny of Chinese investment in sensitive sectors such as technology and infrastructure. In April 2023, the EU launched a joint initiative with the United States and Japan to help reform the World Trade Organization (WTO). America First activists are most angry about issues such as forced technology transfer and subsidies because they directly attack China’s specific trade policies.
China’s diplomatic strategy
Beijing has stepped up its efforts to promote the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2023 and invited partner countries to participate in it, partly to offset this political pressure from the EU. In response, China hopes to reduce the impact of EU trade barriers by building better economic relations with African, Asian and Latin American countries, in line with the EU’s plan to look beyond Europe. China has also tried to leverage its economic strength in the EU. According to the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, in 2023, Chinese investment in major European countries such as Germany and France increased by 5%. This is part of a broader strategy to build economic interdependence and may help ease the way the EU reacts in trade conflicts.
Impact of international organizations
Role of international organizations in the China-EU trade dispute The World Trade Organization is the main venue for complaints and litigation between the two sides. In October 2023, China submitted an application to the WTO to set up a panel on the EU’s tariffs on imported Chinese steel based on anti-dumping allegations. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) also highlighted the broader economic consequences of the dispute. The IMF listed the long-term tensions as a potential destabilizing factor for the global economy and said in its 2023 annual report that the two sides should engage in constructive dialogue.
Human rights and civil conflict
China, accused of serious human rights violations against Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang, has been the subject of criticism from the European Parliament. In late 2023, a June parliamentary report prompted the European Parliament to adopt a resolution condemning China’s treatment of the Uighurs and supporting targeted sanctions against officials responsible for human rights violations on Chinese territory. China, in turn, accused the EU of exaggerating trade concerns and interfering in internal affairs. The bad guy is of course the EU, with Chinese state media slamming the EU on human rights while praising the EU’s economic cooperation with politics.
Partners and alliances
Both China and the EU are working to strengthen technological sovereignty in the strategic alliance as a broader bargaining chip in the trade standoff. In 2023, the EU reached an overall investment agreement with India, promoting further integration of our economies and curbing China’s ambitious expansion plans on the Asian continent. It provides a constructive alignment of interests for its direct and largest trading partner (China), but with intelligent design on which channels of intellectual property protection need to be enforced and some basic checks on sustainability principles that take precedence over the broader trade goals pursued at the EU level.
By March 2023, China and Russia had announced joint economic projects totaling more than $100 billion, aimed at securing access to the Chinese market for Russian gas. The alliance aims to create an economic powerhouse that can withstand external pressures, avoid European encroachment and an expected EU trade embargo.
Israeli Politics
On the domestic front, there are political considerations on both sides of this border that influence the trade dispute. The EU, with its emphasis on populist currents and strong protectionist tendencies, has been under pressure to act in some way against China. In the 2023 European elections, groups advocating for greater trade protection and increased oversight of Chinese investments have seen an increase in support.
China portrays this as the latest vector of its fight against Western hegemony, with Chinese suppliers going bankrupt, and with preliminary results suggesting that more bankruptcies than ever before are expected or will occur next month, one only needs to look at the appreciation of the RMB. Chinese state media has made the same interpretation of the EU’s efforts, arguing that the EU supports the Western campaign to suppress China and maintain its economic dominance.